Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria

An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Business Administration and Management (BAM) for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


    CHAPTER TWO

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    • 2.1 Introduction
    • 2.2 Conceptual Review
    • 2.3 Theoretical Framework
    • 2.4 Empirical Studies
    • 2.5 Research Gaps
    • 2.6 Summary of Literature Review

    CHAPTER THREE

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    • 3.1 Introduction
    • 3.2 Research Design
    • 3.3 Population of Study
    • 3.4 Sampling and Sampling Technique
    • 3.5 Validation of Research Instrument
    • 3.6 Method of Data Collection
    • 3.7 Method of Data Analysis
    • 3.8 Questionnaire Administration
    • 3.9 Ethical Consideration
    • 3.10 Statistical Analysis

    CHAPTER FOUR

    DATA ANALYSIS, RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    • 4.1 Introduction
    • 4.2 Presentation and Analysis of Data
    • 4.3 Re-statement of Research Questions
    • 4.4 Test of Hypotheses
    • 4.5 Discussion of Findings

    CHAPTER FIVE

    SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    • 5.1 Introduction
    • 5.2 Summary of Findings
    • 5.3 Conclusion
    • 5.4 Recommendation
    • 5.5 Suggestion for Further Study

    REFERENCES

    APPENDIX A - “QUESTIONNAIRE”



    ABSTRACT

    The purpose of this research work is to have a detail evaluation of managerial supervisory performance appraisal system in Nigeria.

    The Nigeria telecommunication Nitel Enugu was used as the case study. The strength of the Nitel staff is about 114 workers with sample of 89 workers, the total of 89 questionnaire were printed and 86 were collected and analyzed in table.

    The source of this research work is from both secondary and primary sources.

    It was found out that performance appraisal system can be improved by preventing all form of bias, nepotism and favoritism and on the other and encourage justice, fair play and equity.

    Thus it was recommended that modern equipment’s and tools should be provided for the staff to carry out their duties effectively.



    An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria



    Introduction

    1.1 Background Of The Study

    Appraisal is synonymous with evaluation. An evaluation of managerial supervisory performance appraisal system in Nigeria which is the topic for this study has to do with the assessment of the performance of those entrusted with the supervision or management of the organization. In other words it has to do with the evaluation of how effectively and efficiently they have been able to carry out their function of planning, co – ordination, directing and controlling decision making in the organization to fulfill the objectives for which the organization was set up to achieve. These objectives are to serve as a medium of communication, enriching the life of the Nigeria by influencing his social cultural, political and technological thinking. More so as educate and inform all these at a profit to the organization.

    Objectives appraisal is good for any organization because it help one to know where he or she is as contracted to where he or she wants or ought to be Vis Avis the achievement of his / her goals and the difference. This enables him or her to plan effectively and more efficiently too.

    In the worker place, the management (I.e. The operational) engages in the appraisal of subordinates from time to time. They evaluate the contribution capabilities and short coming of the subordinate with a view to knowing their performance. The result obtained can lead to promotions, recommendation for promotion, or even dismissal. There is no other way to do this if not through his output, displayed positive and negative attributes. It is no gain saying that performance appraisal is invaluable planning, coordinating, policy formation, decision making and control.

    The employees on the other hand engage in some form of informal appraisal of self, co – workers, supervisors and managers. So they are not totally ignorant of rating of these people. Since “formal” performance appraisal is used for most appointment, pay raises, promotion, down grading and dismissal. And employees of human resources being the most important assets of the organization. Managers and supervisors most exercise utmost care in doing this. This is poorly evaluated; it will surely affect his morale and attitude to work. This will result in lower productivity.

    Again if a bad worker is rated higher than the good ones, the moral of the good workers would be damped as this would be a clear testimony or indication that their hard worker and contributions were not taken into cognizance in the appraisal process.

    Appraisal in public service is full of paradoxes and love hate intrigues. Staff performance appraisal not done with objectivity, honesty and fair play breeds’ resentment, disillusionment and a host of other things that are inimical to the progress of the organization.

    Robert stolz a management consultant believes and rightly too that with a right kind of appraisal a real industrial need to fulfilled staff appraisal are carried out in organization for administration, informative and motivational purpose.

    Formalized appraisal permit an orderly and rational way of determine promotion, salary increase, transfers, training needs, potentials retrenchment, reassignment, termination of appointment etc. it is against this background that the researcher want to delve into the evaluation of managerial supervisory performance appraisal system I Nigeria telecommunication Nitel Enugu.


    1.2 Statement Of The Problem

    For any organization to achieve its goals and objectives, quality of management is very necessary. Nepotism, favoritism, poor manpower utilization pervades the ranks and file government parastatals thus cultivating inefficiency. In Nigeria, there are many square pegs in round holes most times; the tail is wagging the dog instead of the other way round. Leadership is generally deficient because of their social connections, sycophancy or blood relationship. Despite the abundance of qualified and competent manpower, mediocrity is the order of the day. Consequently we observe escalating frustration, low debilitating internal policies and low productivity everywhere. This accounts for why many civil servant idle away time at offices if and when they come to work as a place to collect monthly salaries and allowances without working for them conscientiously.

    Government desirous for the statuesque to stop commercialized and privatized most of its parastatals and agencies.

    The study seeks to know whether the management and the supervisory staff are living up to their obligations.


    1.3 Purpose Of The Study

    The purpose of this study is to

    1. Evaluate the managerial supervisory performance appraisal system in Nitel Enugu.
    2. Find out whether the present system of appraisal has any relation with overall performance practices, decisions, viability, productivity and development as well as achievement of corporate goal.
    3. Ascertain the problem militating against management and supervisors in the task
    4. To identify whether the management is utilizing MBO efficiently and effectively.
    5. To determine the effects of ineffective formal appraisal to the activities of Niter Enugu.

    1.4 Significance Of The Study

    This research has varying degrees of significance to various categories of users such as researcher, management and those who may wish to make reference to it from time to time.

    Again it is a prerequisite to the award of higher national diploma (HND) in this institution

    Staff and management performance appraisal is very important to any organization that wants to remain a going concern.

    It will also make the managers and supervisors to be alive to their duties of supervising and appraising.

    The employees stand to gain immensely through better corporate performance.


    1.5 Research Question

    1. What are the techniques and methods used to evaluate staff at Nitel Enugu?
    2. Have targets and goal against which performance were set and measure been clearly understood by the staff?
    3. Are staff promoted, rewarded, punished or dismissed based on properly laid down criteria?
    4. How objectives and effective is management by objectives appraisal system in this organization?
    5. Are performance report submitted regularly?
    6. What is the effect of inefficient interview held in Nitel?

    1.6 Research Hypothesis

    Hypothesis I
    • Ho: staff are not promoted, rewarded, punished or dismissed based on properly laid down criteria.
    • Hi: staff are promoted, rewarded, punished or dismissed based on properly laid down criteria.
    Hypothesis ii
    • Ho: the staff performance are not appraised and evaluated regularly
    • Hi: the staff performance is appraised and evaluated regularly.

    1.7 Scope Of The Study

    Evaluating performance appraisal is important in all organization in Nigeria. The scope of this study is to set out to study the evaluation of managerial supervisory performance appraisal system in the entire Nitel nation wide but it is limited to the Nitel Enugu district.


    1.8 Limitation Of The Study

    Conducting a research of this nature cannot be done without meeting some impediments. The study dealt with Nigeria telecommunication Enugu district.

    The problems encountered were time. Finance created another problem being able to source enough fund to run around and collect the necessary materials required for the execution of this project.


    1.9 Definition Of Term

    Statuesque

    Social situation as it is now

    Subterranean

    Underground


    CHAPTER TWO

    2.0 Literature Review

    2.1 Introduction

    This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

    Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

    Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


    To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


    Seminar Material
    ₦3,000
    Project Material
    ₦5,000

    For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


    Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

    ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
    Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
    MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
    Paycom (OPay)8030511988

    –– or ––



    After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


    Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




    You can get more research topics on Business Administration and Management, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

    Defense Procedure for Business Administration and Management Researchers


    In preparation for defending a project or seminar on An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


    Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


    Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


    During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


    Page Content Headings - An Evaluation of Managerial Supervisory Performance Appraisal System in Nigeria

      Download Material (Docx)