1.1 Introduction
Mental health and well-being are related and contribute to the decrease of students’ academic performance (in the current study defined as student retention, grade point average and obtained credits Bruffaerts et al., 2018). Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) is the interdisciplinary field that investigates how to devise educational systems that provide instruction tailored to the needs of individual learners, as many good teachers do. Mental health, although not a new concern, has become increasingly acceptable to discuss in recent years. A growing body of research about college students’ mental health concerns underlines the need for educators to consider how mental health might affect students and what courses of action are available. This is imperative given how mental illness may hinder student success (Breslau, Lane, Sampson, & Kessler, 2008; Cranford, Eisenberg, & Serras, 2009; Elion, Wang, Slaney, & French, 2012; Keyes, Eisenberg, Perry, Dube, Kroenke, & Dhingra, 2012; Thompson, Connely, Thomas-Jones, & Eggert, 2013).
As a prelude to other parts of this study, this chapter will discuss the background upon which this study was initiated, the statement of problems that led to this study, the Aim and Objectives of the study. Others are Significance of the study, Scope of work, Limitations of the Study and Definition of technical terms.
1.2 Background of Study
Since the early 1970s, the field of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (also known as Artificial Intelligence in Education) has investigated combining research in Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science and Education to devise intelligent agents that can act as tutors in computer-aided-instruction (CAI).
The Overall Structure of the Mental Health Intelligent Evaluation System In order to enable people to have an accurate understanding of their own mental health and at the same time to promote the scientific and informatization of mental health guidance, a mental health intelligent evaluation system based on the decision tree algorithm is constructed, and scientific mental health evaluation tools are used to comprehensively and objectively reflect the user’s mental health level (Wang et al., 2020).
Traditional CAI systems support learning by encoding sets of exercises and the associated solutions, and by providing predefined remediation actions when the students’ answers to do not match the encoded solutions. This form of CAI can be very useful in supporting well-defined drill-and practice activities. However, it is difficult to scale to more complex pedagogical activities, because the system designer needs to define all relevant problem components, all solutions (correct or incorrect) that the system needs to recognize, and all possible relevant pedagogical actions that the tutor may need to take.
1.3 Statement of Problem
Investigation revealed the college students with mental health problems are twice as likely to drop out (Kessler et al., 1995; Hartley, 2010), and depression and suicidal thoughts relate to a lower GPA (Mortier et al., 2015; De Luca et al., 2016). Mental health and academic performance are thus interrelated. However, others might require more follow-up and interaction, or might need coaching on mental health problems that interfere with their academic performance. Coaches and psychologists could facilitate personalized follow-up and interaction, but it would be time-consuming and costly.
Most higher education institutions do not have the capacity to offer this kind of support. Therefore, there is a need for other scalable solutions that offer a personalized and interactive program and contribute to early recognition of problems with academic performance or well- being, in order to prevent more severe problems.
1.4 Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of the study is to design and implement a intelligent system to monitor students mental state. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out as follows to develop an application software that will:
- Allow students interact by asking questions.
- Provide possible answers to the questions from students
- Test the students’ mental state by analyzing their performance.
- Explain instructional material to oneself in terms of the underlying domain knowledge (self-explanation)