Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN

Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Electrical / Electronics Engineering (EE) for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

  • 1.0 Introduction
  • 1.1 Significance of the study
  • 1.2 Definition of terms
  • 1.2.1 Reliability
  • 1.2.2 Failure Rate
  • 1.2.3 Mean Time Before Failure
  • 1.3 Causes of Failure

CHAPTER TWO

  • Literature Review

CHAPTER THREE

  • 3.0 Research Methodology
  • 3.1 Sampling Techniques
  • 3.2 Sources of Data
  • 3.2.1 Primary Sources
  • 3.2.2 Secondary Sources
  • 3.3 Validation of Instrument
  • 3.4 Techniques of Data Analysis

CHAPTER FOUR

  • Table 4.1: Monthly Peak Load and Number of Consumers.
  • Table 4.2: Summary of Fault Data for 2006
  • Table 4.3: Summary of Fault Data for 2007
  • Table 4.4: Summary of Fault Data for 2008
  • 4.1 Computation of Fault intervals
  • 4.2 Computation of Mean
  • 4.3 Computation of Variance
  • Table 4.5: Values of F(x — x) Obtained for various Months
  • 4.4 Computation of Expected Frequency
  • 4.5 Computation of Chi-Square
  • Table 4.6: Presentation of Fault Intervals, Observed Frequencies, Calculated/Expected frequencies, Mean, Variance and Calculated Chi-Square.
  • 4.6 Computation of Reliability Indices in Operating Hours
  • 4.6.1 Failure rate for Months in Hours
  • 4.6.2 System Reliability of each Month
  • 4.6.3 Failure Distribution Function for the System
  • 4.6.4 Life Time Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF)
  • 4.6.5 Life Time Probability Distribution Function (PDF)
  • 4.6.6 System Interruption Frequency Index
  • Table 4.8: Reliability indices
  • 4.7 Discussion/Analysis of Result

CHAPTER FIVE

  • 5.0 Conclusion and Recommendation
  • 5.1 Conclusion
  • 5.2 Recommendation

REFERENCES



ABSTRACT

Today's economic climate requires that every industry aim at achieving maximum production capability while minimizing capital investment. This means finding ways to maximize equipment reliability and up-time as well as extend plant and equipment life.

This project focuses on the assessment of systems reliability performance of Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) with Diobu Distribution network (Port Harcourt) as our case study, using daily fault data for three years, viz; 2006, 2007 and 2008. The Poisson distribution and the chi-square were used to determine the appropriateness of the observed data collected.

The chi-square was used to assess the goodness of fit of the Poisson distribution hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. The project work estimate the reliability indices of failure rate (), system reliability R(t), failure density function F(t) and system interruption frequency index.



Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN (A Case Study of Diobu District (Port Harcourt) Distribution Network)


1.0 Introduction

Distribution networks differ from transmission networks in quite a number of ways, ranging from voltage magnitude to the number of branches and sources. The number of branches and sources is much higher in distribution networks and the voltage magnitude lower. Its general structure of make up is quite different from that of the transmission networks.

A typical distribution system consist of step down transformer e.g. 132/11kv, at a bulk supply point feeding a number of cables. A series of step-down three phase transformers, e.g. 11kv/415v, are spaced in route and from these, the consumers are supplies three phase, four wire networks which give 240 single phase to house and other similar loads.

Also, large scale or industrial consumers could be supplied at 33kv or 11kv.

The objective of power system company is to maintain a continuous and adequate power supply to its consumers at a reasonable rate of return. In Nigeria, this objective is far from being met. Hence, there is the need to focus our attention on reliability as a way of assessing and improving the power system as well as optimizing our investment in the distribution network.

Reliability studies are performed to maximize the reliability, efficiency and safety of an electric power system.

It has been observed that a major part of service interruptions experienced by consumers has its origin in failure from the distribution system (mostly 33kv and below in Nigeria, with radial arrangement), and the distribution system reliability studies have been hindered due to the unavailability of component outage on the distribution system.

Hence, the need to maintain a reliable and effective distribution system using the available equipment on the system is very important and necessary.

1.1 Significance of the Study

The significance or relevance of this study are as listed below:

  1. Improve efficiency.
  2. Increase operating reliability.
  3. Improve system maintainability.
  4. Reduce operating cost.
  5. Evaluate the impact of adding new equipment.
  6. Optimize system upgrades.
  7. Identify sources of failures.

1.2 Definition of Terms


1.2.1 Reliability, R(t):

This can be defined as the capability of an equipment or asset to continue to perform its intended function under specified condition for a stated period of time. It is normally measured as the mean time between failures (MTBF) for each system. Dunn, 2002).


1.2.2 Failure Rate:

This is the number of faults or failures per unit time. The symbol is ?.


1.2.3 Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF):

This is the mean value of the length of time that elapses between failures.


1.3 Causes of Faults

The causes of faults include the following:

  1. Lightning strike
  2. Heavy wind
  3. Trees falling across wires
  4. Failure of insulators
  5. Vehicle collision with electric poles
  6. Illegal connections/operation by consumers
  7. Vandalization.

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN (A Case Study of Diobu District (Port Harcourt) Distribution Network)”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


Seminar Material
₦3,000
Project Material
₦5,000

For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
Paycom (OPay)8030511988

–– or ––



After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




You can get more research topics on Electrical / Electronics Engineering, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

Defense Procedure for Electrical / Electronics Engineering Researchers


In preparation for defending a project or seminar on Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


Page Content Headings - Assessment of Systems Reliability Performance of PHCN (A Case Study of Diobu District (Port Harcourt) Distribution Network)

    Download Material (Docx)