Project Topics Seminar Topics School of Nursing Exam PDF Sign Up
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
Sparklyn A Critique of Robert Nozick's Libertarian Political Theory
WhatsApp Channel

A Critique of Robert Nozick's Libertarian Political Theory


This page presents an excerpt of the research material, providing a comprehensive overview of the study. It includes the Preliminary Pages, Table of Contents, Abstract, Chapters One to Five, and References, making it accessible and informative for students, researchers, and other readers interested in the topic of this study. Acknowledgement is also included, expressing gratitude to the individuals, institutions, and resources that contributed to the successful completion of the research, with materials and information sourced from the online platform sparklyn.com.ng, which provided valuable academic support.



1.1 Introduction

Robert Nozick (1938-2002) was American philosopher, best known for his rigorous defense of libertarianism in his first major work, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). During his high school and college years, Nozick was a member of the student new left and an enthusiastic socialist. At Columbia, he helped to found a campus branch of the league for industrial democracy, a precursor of the students for a democratic society. While in graduate school he read works by libertarian thinkers such as F. A. Hayak and Ludwig Von Mises, and his political views began to change. His conversion to libertarianism culminated in 1974 with the publication of Anarchy, State, and Utopia, a closely argued and highly original defense of the libertarian “minimal state” and a critique of the social-democratic liberalism of John Rowls.

The main body of this work falls into four parts; firstly the underpinning (if any) and the character and robustness of the moral rights that constitute the basic normative framework for most of Anarchy, State and Utopia. Secondly, the character and degree of success of Nozick's defense of the minimal state against the charge by the individualist anarchist that “the state itself is intrinsically immoral”. Thirdly, Nozick's articulation and defense of his historical entitlement doctrine of justice in holdings and his associated critique of end-state and patterned doctrines of distributive justice, especially John Rawls' difference principle (as defended in a theory of justice) and fourthly Nozick's argument that utopian aspirations provide a complementary route to the vindication of the minimal state.


1.2 Statement Of The Problem

Nozick's natural rights − particularly the right of self-ownership and the consequent right to the fruit's of one's labour present an obvious problems if we desire any state at all, no matter how minimal.


CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW


2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review presents current knowledge, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions, related to A Critique of Robert Nozick's Libertarian Political Theory. It documents the state of the art on the subject under study and provides a comprehensive survey of existing literature. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …


How to Download the Complete PDF Material (Table of Contents, Abstract, Chapter 1-5, and References)


Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “A Critique of Robert Nozick’s Libertarian Political Theory”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request. Get in touch with us here!

Download Material (Docx)