1.1 Introduction
Conflict management is a deliberate process of identifying, addressing, and resolving disputes or disagreements within an organization in a constructive manner (Rahim, 2017). Conflict itself is defined as a situation in which two or more parties perceive incompatible goals, values, or interests, leading to tension or opposition (Robbins & Judge, 2019). In public organizations, which are structured to serve the interest of the public and operate under bureaucratic regulations, conflict is a common occurrence due to diverse personnel, rigid procedures, and varying expectations (Cameron & Green, 2019). The management of conflict in public organizations is crucial because unresolved disputes hinder effective service delivery, reduce employee motivation, and impair organizational performance (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003).
As a prelude to other parts of this study, this chapter will discuss the background upon which this study was initiated, the statement of problems that led to this study, the Aim and Objectives of the study. Others are Significance of the study, Scope of work, Research hypothesis and questions, Limitation of the study and Definition of terms.
1.2 Background of the Study
Conflict is a natural and inevitable phenomenon in organizational life, particularly within public organizations where diverse interests, roles, and responsibilities converge (Robbins & Judge, 2019). According to Rahim (2017), conflict arises when there is a perceived incompatibility of goals, values, or resources between individuals or groups, leading to tension and disagreements. Public organizations, due to their hierarchical structure and bureaucratic processes, often experience conflicts stemming from unclear roles, limited resources, and differences in personal or professional objectives (Cameron & Green, 2019). It has been reported that unresolved conflict in public organizations negatively affects employee morale, reduces productivity, and hampers effective decision-making processes (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003).
Thomas and Kilmann (2008) asserted that conflict management is not merely about resolving disputes but also about understanding the underlying causes and adopting strategies that promote collaboration and organizational harmony. On the other hand, inadequate conflict management strategies have been shown to escalate disputes, resulting in workplace tension, poor service delivery, and decreased employee commitment (Rahim, 2017).
Research into conflict management processes in public organizations has evolved alongside broader developments in public administration and management science. Robbins and Judge (2019) stated that public organizations are particularly prone to conflict due to their hierarchical structures, formalized procedures, and diverse stakeholder interests. On the other hand, studies in the late 20th century began to recognize that conflict, when managed effectively, stimulate creative problem-solving, and improve organizational performance (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003).
Thomas and Kilmann (2008) affirmed that structured conflict management frameworks, including avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration strategies, provide managers with tools to address disputes constructively. Meanwhile, Cameron and Green (2019) contend that public organizations face unique challenges in implementing these strategies because bureaucratic rigidities and limited managerial training often hinder timely and effective conflict resolution. In addition, the integration of human resource management practices in conflict management has been highlighted as a significant development in recent decades (Rahim, 2017).
Several scholars have stated that conflict in public organizations is often exacerbated by bureaucratic rigidity, poor communication, and limited managerial capacity in handling disputes effectively (Cameron & Green, 2019; Robbins & Judge, 2019). Jehn and Bendersky (2003) affirmed that conflicts, if properly managed, can serve as catalysts for innovation, improved teamwork, and enhanced problem-solving within organizations. On the other hand, the absence of structured conflict management mechanisms leads to recurring disputes, mistrust among employees, and overall organizational inefficiency. Some authors contend that public organizations require well-designed conflict management frameworks that not only address disputes as they arise but also foster a culture of mutual respect, transparency, and accountability (Rahim, 2017). This study is set against the backdrop of the recurring challenges of conflict in public organizations and the pressing need to assess existing conflict management processes to ensure organizational stability, and improved service delivery.
1.3 Statement of Problems
Investigation revealed that conflict is an inevitable aspect of any organizational setting, and public organizations are no exception. In the public sector, conflicts arise due to differences in interests, values, objectives, and work methods among employees and between management and staff (Robbins & Judge, 2019). Such conflicts, if not properly managed, result in reduced productivity, poor employee morale, and delayed decision-making processes, ultimately affecting the organization's overall performance (Rahim, 2017). On the other hand, the existing conflict management strategies in many public organizations are often outdated, poorly implemented, or inconsistently applied, leading to recurring disputes and unresolved tensions among personnel.
Research indicates that ineffective conflict management is responsible for high employee turnover, workplace dissatisfaction, and a lack of commitment to organizational goals (Thomas & Kilmann, 2008). Public organizations also experience bureaucratic bottlenecks, which limit the flexibility of managers in resolving conflicts effectively (Cameron & Green, 2019). Furthermore, the absence of a structured framework to handle disputes often leaves employees feeling marginalized, ignored, or unfairly treated, which is detrimental to organizational harmony (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003). It is against this backdrop that this study seeks to assess the conflict management process in public organizations.
1.4 Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of the study is to assess the conflict management process in public organizations and determine effective approaches for managing workplace disputes in order to improve organizational performance. The specific objectives of this study are:
- To determine the impact of conflict management on employee morale and organizational performance.
- To identify the common causes of conflict in public organizations.
- To examine the conflict management strategies employed by managers in public organizations.
- To assess the effectiveness of existing conflict management processes.
- To propose recommendations for improving conflict management practices in public organizations.
1.5 Research Questions
Based on the stated objectives, the study will address the following research questions:
- What are the common causes of conflict in public organizations?
- What conflict management strategies are employed by managers in public organizations?
- How effective are the existing conflict management processes in resolving disputes?
- What is the impact of conflict management on employee morale and organizational performance?
- What strategies will improve conflict management practices in public organizations?
1.6 Significance of the Study
It is believed that at the completion of the study, the findings will support managers in adopting effective strategies that improve employee relations, enhance organizational efficiency, and promote a positive work environment.
Furthermore, the study will be useful to policymakers and government agencies by accentuating areas where administrative reforms and procedural improvements are necessary to reduce workplace tensions.
Academically, the study will serve as a reference for future research on organizational behavior, human resource management, and public administration. Also, the outcomes of this study will support sustainable organizational growth, improved employee relations, and effective management practices in public organizations.
1.7 Research Hypotheses
In order to pursue the objective of this study, the following generalized statements have been designed to guide and aids in obtaining the result for the experiment to be conducted. For this work, the null hypothesis will be represented with H0 while the alternative hypothesis will be represented with hypothesis H1.
- H01: There is no significant relationship between conflict management processes and organizational performance in public organizations.
- H02: Effective conflict management processes have a positive impact on employee morale in public organizations.
- H03: The use of appropriate conflict management strategies improves overall organizational performance.
1.8 Scope of the Study
The scope of this research is focused on assessing conflict management process in the public organization in Lagos State public organizations, including causes, strategies, and impacts on performance.
The research study was limited by insufficient access to comprehensive organizational records, reluctance of respondents to provide complete information, and logistical challenges that affected data collection.
1.9 Definition of Terms
Conflict:
Conflict is a situation where individuals or groups perceive incompatible goals, values, or interests, leading to disagreement or tension (Rahim, 2017).
Conflict Management:
Conflict management is the systematic process of identifying, addressing, and resolving disputes in a constructive manner to maintain organizational harmony (Robbins & Judge, 2019).
Public Organization:
A public organization is an institution owned and managed by the government, tasked with providing services or executing policies for the public good (Cameron & Green, 2019).
Employee Morale:
Employee morale refers to the overall attitude, satisfaction, and sense of well-being of employees within an organization, influenced by working conditions, relationships, and management practices (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003).
…
