Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities

Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Education for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


    CHAPTER TWO

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    • 2.1 Introduction
    • 2.2 Conceptual Review
    • 2.3 Theoretical Framework
    • 2.4 Empirical Studies
    • 2.5 Research Gaps
    • 2.6 Summary of Literature Review

    CHAPTER THREE

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    • 3.1 Introduction
    • 3.2 Research Design
    • 3.3 Population of Study
    • 3.4 Sampling and Sampling Technique
    • 3.5 Validation of Research Instrument
    • 3.6 Method of Data Collection
    • 3.7 Method of Data Analysis
    • 3.8 Questionnaire Administration
    • 3.9 Ethical Consideration
    • 3.10 Statistical Analysis

    CHAPTER FOUR

    DATA ANALYSIS, RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    • 4.1 Introduction
    • 4.2 Presentation and Analysis of Data
    • 4.3 Re-statement of Research Questions
    • 4.4 Test of Hypotheses
    • 4.5 Discussion of Findings

    CHAPTER FIVE

    SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    • 5.1 Introduction
    • 5.2 Summary of Findings
    • 5.3 Conclusion
    • 5.4 Recommendation
    • 5.5 Suggestion for Further Study

    REFERENCES

    APPENDIX A - “QUESTIONNAIRE”



    Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities


    1.0 Introduction

    1.1 Background Of Study

    Biology is a branch of natural science that deals with the study of living organisms, including their structures, functioning, evolution, distribution and interrelationships. (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English language, 2009). Biology occupies a unique position in the secondary school education curriculum because of its importance as science of life.

    In Nigeria the secondary school Biology curriculum is designed to continue students investigation into natural phenomena, to deepen students’ understanding and interest in biological sciences, and also to encourage students‘ability to apply scientific knowledge to everyday life in matters of personal, community, health and agriculture among others (Federal Ministry of Education, 2009). Biology is a very important science subject and stands as the bedrock upon which are based many other science courses like Medicine, Pharmacy, Nursing, Biochemistry, Genetic, Agriculture etc., that are of great economic importance to a nation.

    Besides, the importance of Biology to mankind as science of life, it is one of the science subject mostly preferred by many students in the secondary schools because it has less mathematical calculations unlike Physics and Chemistry and deals with non-abstract things. Because of these reasons, Biology has a very high enrolment of students in the external examination (Senior School Certificate Examination) more than Physics and Chemistry.

    Regardless of the high number of students’ enrolment in Biology in the senior school examinations conducted by West African Examination Council (WAEC) and National Examination Council (NECO), reports from scholars and educators (Nwagbo, 1999; Biology Chief Examiner‘s Report, 2007; Ige, 2009 and Opara, 2011) indicated that students’ achievement in Biology in the external examinations is poor. The poor achievement of students in Biology in external examination is linked to the use of traditional method (lecture/expository method) in teaching secondary school biology (Isiugo-Abanihe; LongJohn and Ibiene 2010).

    The traditional/conventional teaching methods often used by teachers in teaching Biology include the lecture/expository method, demonstration and direct instruction etc. These traditional methods of teaching stress more on the transmission of knowledge in a manner that emphasizes memorization hence they have been characterized by some educators (Ibe and Nwosu, 2003; Sawa, 2011 and Kirshner, Sweller and Clark, 2006) as a poor method of teaching biology and other science subjects.

    The conventional/traditional teaching methods involve unidirectional flow of information/knowledge from teacher to the students and do not encourage process skill acquisition needed for proper understanding of biological principles, concepts and facts.

    Guisti (2008) referred to these traditional teaching methods as teacher-centered approaches to learning in the sense that the teacher and those up in the educational hierarchy are considered as the possessor of knowledge to be transferred to the students, and as such decides how the knowledge transfer takes place. The unidirectional flow of information in the traditional biology delivery content makes students passive and unable to construct meaningful knowledge in the teaching and learning of Biology.


    1.2 Statement Of The Problem

    Service delivery in science subject like biology matters a lot but often at times the students might perform very poor due to use of poor methods of teaching by the teachers, it could also be lack of interest in teaching and learning and sometimes influence of gender.

    Finally, several researches has been carried out on comparative analysis of biology method of teaching but not even a single research has been carried out on comparative analysis of biology delivery contents in conventional and university of technology.


    1.3 Aims And Objectives Of Study

    The main aim of the study is to examine the comparative analysis of biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology.

    Other specific objectives of the study include;

    1. To determine the factors affecting biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology.
    2. To determine the effect of biology delivery contents on students in conventional and universities of technology.
    3. To determine the influence of biology delivery contents on gender in conventional and universities of technology.
    4. To proffer possible solutions to the problems.

    1.4 Research Questions

    1. What are the factors affecting biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology?
    2. What is the effect of biology delivery contents on students in conventional and universities of technology?
    3. What is the influence of biology delivery contents on gender in conventional and universities of technology?
    4. What are the possible solutions to the problems?

    1.5 Statement Of Research Hypothesis

    Hypothesis 1
    • H0: There is no significant relationship between the method of biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology
    • H1: There is significant relationship between the method of biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology
    Hypothesis 2
    • H0: there is no significant difference between biology delivery contents between conventional and universities of technology.
    • H1: there is significant difference between biology delivery contents between conventional and universities of technology.
    Hypothesis 3
    • H0: Gender does not influence students’ academic performance under the nature of biology delivery contents for conventional and universities of technology
    • H0: Gender influences students’ academic performance under the nature of biology delivery contents for conventional and universities of technology

    1.6 Significance Of Study

    The study on the comparative analysis of biology delivery contents in conventional and universities of technology will be of immense benefit to the entire universities of technology in the sense that it will teachers of biology in the identification of a more effective biology service delivery that will help the students to achieve high in biology and have increased interest for biology which will make them to opt for science courses in higher institution and also appreciate the world of things around them.

    It will also enable the teachers and science educators on the identification of better biology delivery content that will make teaching and learning process more interesting because students‘ achievement will be improved upon and their interest sustained, thus enabling the realization of the stated instructional objectives which is the goal of any academic enterprise. Finally, the study will contribute to the body of existing literature and knowledge to this field of studied and basis for further research.


    1.7 Scope Of Study

    The study on comparative analysis of biology delivery content is limited to conventional and universities of technology.


    1.8 Limitation Of Study

    Financial constraint

    Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).

    Time constraint

    The researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work. This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work.


    1.9 Definition Of Terms

    Comparative

    Measured or judged by estimating the similarity or dissimilarity between one thing and another; relative

    Analysis

    Detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

    Biology

    Is the natural science that studies life and living organisms, including their physical structure, chemical processes, molecular interactions, physiological mechanisms, development and evolution.

    Conventional

    Based on or in accordance with what is generally done or believed.


    CHAPTER TWO

    2.0 Literature Review

    2.1 Introduction

    This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

    Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

    Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


    To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


    Seminar Material
    ₦3,000
    Project Material
    ₦5,000

    For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


    Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

    ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
    Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
    MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
    Paycom (OPay)8030511988

    –– or ––



    After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


    Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




    You can get more research topics on Education, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

    Defense Procedure for Education Researchers


    In preparation for defending a project or seminar on Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


    Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


    Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


    During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


    Page Content Headings - Comparative Analysis of Biology Delivery Contents in Conventional and Universities

      Download Material (Docx)