Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State

Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Public Health for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

  • Introduction 1
  • 1.1 Background of the study 1
  • 1.2 Statement of the problem 3
  • 1.3 Justification of the study 4
  • 1.4 Objectives 5

CHAPTER TWO

  • Literature Review 6
  • 2.1 Historical Perspective 6
  • 2.2 Immunization schedule in Nigeria (see annex) 8
  • 2.3 Factors that influence Immunization Coverage − 8
  • 2.4 Socio-economic status 10
  • 2.5 Concern about vaccine safety and contraindications to immunization 11
  • 2.6 Missed Opportunities 12

CHAPTER THREE

  • Subject, Materials and Methods 15
  • 3.1 General background (Map as annexed) study Area 15
  • 3.2 Study Population 16
  • 3.3 Study Design 16
  • 3.4 Sample size determination 17
  • 3.5 Sampling Technique 18
  • 3.6 Data Collection (a) Questionnaire 20
  • 3.7 Data Entry and Analysis 21
  • 3.8 Study Hypothesis and decision rules 22
  • 3.9 Ethical Consideration 22
  • 3.10 Limitation of the study 23
  • 3.11 Working Definitions 24

CHAPTER FOUR

  • Results 27
  • 4.0 Characteristics of the study population 27

CHAPTER FIVE

  • Discussion 48

CHAPTER SIX

  • Conclusion 60
  • Recommendation 62
  • Reference: 64
  • APPENDIX 1
  • Map of Anambra east LGA showing political wards 76
  • APPENDIX 2
  • NPI routine immunization schedule for children (less than 1 year) − 77
  • APPENDIX 3
  • List of political wards in Anambra East Local Government 78
  • APPENDIX 4
  • Questionnaire 79
  • Ethical Approval 80



ABSTRACT

Background

Childhood immunization is a cost effective public health strategy. Expanded Programme on immunization (EPI) services have been provided in Anambra East local government area of Anambra State mainly through the health facilities in the LGA.

Objective

The objective of this survey was to assess vaccination coverage and its determinants in this rural suburb in Nigeria.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in October 2010, which included the use of interviewer-administered questionnaire to assess knowledge of mothers of children aged 12-23 months on childhood immunization and vaccination coverage of the children. Survey participants were selected using a multistage sampling method. Vaccination coverage was assessed by vaccination card and material history. A child was said to be fully vaccinated if he or she had received all the following vaccines: a dose of BCG, three

doses of OPV and DPT, and one dose of measles by the time he or she was enrolled in the survey. Person chi-square (x2) test was performed to identify determinants of full immunization status.

Results

250 mothers and 250 children (each mother had one eligible child) were included in the survey. 80 (32%) of the children were fully immunized while 112 (44.8%) were not immunized from the vaccination cards while with maternal history 86 (34.4%) were fully immunized, though this difference was not statistically significant P = 0.210 45 (26.5%) of 170 children who defaulted had visited a health facility since their last vaccination or since they attained appropriate age.

Majority of the children 109 (43.6%) received their vaccination in Public health facilities.
Chi-square test showed that mothers educational status (P = 0.004), religious denomination (P = 0.019) and child’s problem after immunization P = 0.012 were significantly associated with under immunization.

Conclusion / Recommendations

It is therefore concluded that despite all the efforts made by the government, the vaccination coverage in this rural suburb is still at a level that does not provide high protection (80%) against DPT/ OPV and even measles.
To improve on the low immunization coverage, attention should be paid to female education, health education, capacity building of the immunization service providers and supportive supervision.



Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State



Introduction


Background Of The Study

Immunization remains one of the most important public health interventions and a cost effective strategy to reduce both the morbidity and mortality associated with communicable diseases. Over two million deaths are prevented through immunization each year worldwide1. Despite this, vaccine preventable diseases remain the most common cause of childhood mortality with an estimated 3 million deaths each year2. Uptake of vaccination services depends
not only on provision of the services but also on other factors including knowledge and attitude of mothers3,4, density of health workers5, accessibility of vaccination centres and availability of safe needles and syringes.
Nigeria like many countries in Africa is making efforts to strengthen its health system especially routine immunization so as to reduce disease burden from vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs).

In 1979, Nigeria’s Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) was initiated6 (though created in 1974 by WHO, UNICEF and Rotary International as partners). It was relaunched in 1984 due to poor coverage7. In 1996 it became the National Programme on Immunization (NPI). Following a review of EPI Decree 12 of 1997, NPI was made a parastatal.

  1. NPI has a sole responsibility of supervising and enhancing routine and supplemental immunization activities in Nigeria.
  2. Routine immunization (RI) is provided largely through the public health system, with significant variation between the 36 states and Federal Capital Territory (FCT). In Anambra State, private or NGO providers are the source of up to one third of RI in Anambra State8.

Public sector provision is by health staff based at facilities run by the 21 Local Government areas (LGAs), the General hospitals run by the state government and the tertiary institution run by the federal government.
There is also supplemental immunizations done periodically in the state in the form of National Immunization days (NIDs), local immunization days (LIDs), immunization plus days (IPDs) and child health week all aimed at boosting immunization coverage and mopping up and reaching every child (including those not already reached) irrespective of their immunization status.


Statement Of The Problem

Globally, 2.5million children die every year from easily preventable infectious diseases. In the year 2000, measles resulted in 777,000 deaths and 2 million disabilities9. The expanded programme on immunization (EPI) when introduced experienced some initial success. However a few years after its inception, it became obvious that it was no longer achieving its stated objectives and had to be relaunched in 1984.

Nigeria attained universal childhood immunization (UCI) with 81.5 percent coverage for all antigens in 1990, but the success was not to last long and by 1996, immunization coverage had declined substantially to less than 30 percent for DPT-3 and 21 percent for the doses of oral polio virus (OPV).

The situation had continued worsening, that presently the coverage rates of the various childhood vaccines in Nigeria are among the lowest in the world.

The above scenario has been playing itself out in Anambra State. Anambra State has continued to witness fluctuation in immunization coverage for all vaccine preventable diseases with its attendant increase in the incidence of the diseases.

Data from the 2008 National Immunization Coverage Survey shows that only about 23 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization nationally, though this is almost double the value of 13% from the 2003 figure.


Justification Of The Study

Assessing immunization coverage helps to evaluate progress in achieving programme objectives and in improving service delivery10. In addition, evaluation of immunization coverage provides evidence whether substantial progress towards achieving vaccination targets is being made. Such positive evidence is required for continuing support from donor-supported initiative like Global alliance for vaccines and immunization (GAVI)11. It is also expected that findings from the study will help further research work on this topic thereby bridging the gap in knowledge, attitude and practice of the people on immunization.

It is in addition believed that findings will equip policy makers in the planning and policy making on immunization and averting the menace of vaccine preventable diseases in the LGA as there have been recorded outbreaks of measles and a confirmed case of Wild Polio Virus (WPV). It is equally noted that not much work has been done in this field in this locality.


Objectives

General: To determine the Immunization coverage of children aged 12-23 months living in a rural locality (Anambra East Local Government area).


Specific Objectives

  1. To assess immunization coverage levels of children aged 12- 23 months in a rural area of Anambra State.
  2. To assess mother’s knowledge, attitude and practice on childhood immunization.
  3. To identify any missed opportunities among the children.
  4. To identify the factors that are associated with inadequate coverage among the children.

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


Seminar Material
₦3,000
Project Material
₦5,000

For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
Paycom (OPay)8030511988

–– or ––



After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




You can get more research topics on Public Health, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

Defense Procedure for Public Health Researchers


In preparation for defending a project or seminar on Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


Page Content Headings - Evaluation of the Immunization Status of Children in a Rural Suburb of Anambra State

    Download Material (Docx)