Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
A Comparative Analysis of Plato's Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders

A Comparative Analysis of Plato's Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “A Comparative Analysis of Plato's Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Philosophy for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on A Comparative Analysis of Plato's Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

Plato’s Notion Of Philosopher King

  • 1.1 Plato’s biography 1
  • 1.2 What is a State? 3
  • 1.3 Theories of the Origin of the State 6
  • 1.3.1 The Divine Theory 7
  • 1.4 The Social Contract Theory 8
  • 1.4.1 Thomas Hobbes and the social Contract Theory 8
  • 1.4.2 John Locke and the social contract Theory 10
  • 1.4.3 J.J. Rousseau and the social contract Theory 11
  • 1.4.4 The Force Theory 13
  • 1.5 The Natural or organic Theory 14
  • 1.6 The State: The need of having the state 16
  • 1.7 The ideal State: The true state, according to Plato 17
  • 1.8 Laws; The Ideal way of ruling the people, according to Plato 19

CHAPTER TWO

Leadership

  • 2.1 The notion of leadership 21
  • 2.2 Mahatma Gandhi, an example of a true leader 22
  • 2.3 Great leaders of history 24
  • 2.4 Qualities of a good leader 26

CHAPTER THREE

The Problem Of Leadership In Nigeria

  • 3.1 Leadership; Nigeria style 30
  • 3.2 Executive lawlessness 33
  • 3.3 Election and political instability 37
  • 3.4 Religious crisis 39
  • 3.5 Economic crisis 44

CHAPTER FOUR

Plato’S Republic, As A Panacea To Nigeria’s Leadership Problemsl A Comparative Analysis … 47

  • 4.1 Education 49
  • 4.2 The philosopher king 55

CHAPTER FIVE

  • 5.0 Evaluation and conclusion 60

BIBLIOGRAPHY 64



A Comparative Analysis of Plato’s Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders


1.0 Introduction

Plato was a writer, a thinker and a teacher. He stands with Socrates and Aristotle as one of the shapers of the whole intellectual tradition of the West. “He came from a family that had long, played a prominent part in Athenian politics, and it would have been natural for him to follow the same course. He declined to do so, however disguised by the violence and corruption of Athenian political life, and sickened especially by the execution in 399Bc of his friend and teacher, Socrates.”[1]

Plato sought a cure for the ills of society, not in politics, but in philosophy. It is because of this political instability in Athenian society that Plato wrote his famous book, “The Republic”, and arrived at his fundamental and lasting conviction that those ills would never cease until philosophers become rulers or rulers become philosophers. He believes in the “ideal State”. To Plato, it seemed natural that competence should be the qualification for authority. The ruler of the State should be one who has the peculiar abilities to fulfill that function. Looking at history, the world can boast of some rulers who had natural competence, rulers who are philosophically inclined and these same rulers gave a good account of themselves when they ruled. Some of these great rulers are Odumegwu Emeka Ojukwu, Nelson Mandela of South Africa, Martin Luther King Junior of America, Mahatma Gandhi of India, kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe of Nigeria, Leopold Sedar Senghor of Senegal, Ken Saro Wiwa etc. These great men of history distinguished themselves as prominent and reliable personalities during the difficult periods by helping to bring under control, moments of hardships and difficulty. During the most difficult moment for the Igbo’s (Biafran War), Sir Odumegwu Ojukwu stood as a giant between the poor and helpless Igbo’s and their armed enemies. He left everything he owed, believing to die for his people. Nelson Mandela of South Africa showed what is takes to be a great leader, by choosing to be on the side of his people, and remain in prison to being on the side of the enemies, and becoming free.

Taking a look at the situation in Nigerian politics, it seems that we (Nigerians), like the Athenians, are faced with the same leadership problems. Our today leaders have proved to be incapable and philosophically uncritical. This has seriously affected us negatively both socially, politically an economically. With Plato’s Republic, all hope is not lost on our political leaders. Since Plato’s Republic was written in order to arrest the political quagmire in Athens, we hope that Nigerian leaders will become philosophers. “Plato’s idea of rulers becoming philosophers or philosophers becoming rulers is a positive idea.”[2] It has helped towards the development and liberation of many countries like Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana, Tanzania, India, etc. He had through his Republic, saved many societies, countries, from difficult moments or early extinction. It is highly commendable. Plato, through the Academy, which he founded, trained young men who are to be philosophically sound, so as to be qualified to become future philosopher kings.


CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “A Comparative Analysis of Plato’s Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


Seminar Material
₦3,000
Project Material
₦5,000

For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
Paycom (OPay)8030511988

–– or ––



After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




You can get more research topics on Philosophy, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

Defense Procedure for Philosophy Researchers


In preparation for defending a project or seminar on A Comparative Analysis of Plato's Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


Page Content Headings - A Comparative Analysis of Plato’s Notion of Philosopher King and Nigerian Leaders

    Download Material (Docx)