Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches

An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of English Education for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


    CHAPTER TWO

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    • 2.1 Introduction
    • 2.2 Conceptual Review
    • 2.3 Theoretical Framework
    • 2.4 Empirical Studies
    • 2.5 Research Gaps
    • 2.6 Summary of Literature Review

    CHAPTER THREE

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    • 3.1 Introduction
    • 3.2 Research Design
    • 3.3 Population of Study
    • 3.4 Sampling and Sampling Technique
    • 3.5 Validation of Research Instrument
    • 3.6 Method of Data Collection
    • 3.7 Method of Data Analysis
    • 3.8 Questionnaire Administration
    • 3.9 Ethical Consideration
    • 3.10 Statistical Analysis

    CHAPTER FOUR

    DATA ANALYSIS, RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    • 4.1 Introduction
    • 4.2 Presentation and Analysis of Data
    • 4.3 Re-statement of Research Questions
    • 4.4 Test of Hypotheses
    • 4.5 Discussion of Findings

    CHAPTER FIVE

    SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    • 5.1 Introduction
    • 5.2 Summary of Findings
    • 5.3 Conclusion
    • 5.4 Recommendation
    • 5.5 Suggestion for Further Study

    REFERENCES

    APPENDIX A - “QUESTIONNAIRE”



    ABSTRACT

    Redundancy as a property of a language was noticed in research literature in the mid-twentieth century in connection with the emergence and development of information theory. Semantics is the study of meaning. It is a wide subject between the general studies of language. The study scrutinizes the Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out as follows to determine the linguistic motivation for redundancy among students and Establish a clear demarcation between samples of data taken and their Standard English version. The motivation that led to this research work is that, one of the reasons for the increasing of the use of elements of language redundancy is the lack of examples of elitist language proficiency in the media, as the spontaneous speech of journalists, anchor men, bloggers, actors, and other media people is replete with speech errors. The relevance of clarity and correctness in communication cannot be over emphasized. Therefore, this work on semantic redundancy is desirable because it provides some insights into the prevalence of redundancy in the verbal interaction of the students selected as the subject of the project. More so, the findings of this work will not only contribute to the existing literature on semantic redundancy, but would help anyone who goes through this work to avoid tautology in their speech.



    An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students’ Speeches


    1.1 Introduction

    Redundancy as a property of a language was noticed in research literature in the mid- twentieth century in connection with the emergence and development of information theory. Semantics is the study of meaning. It is a wide subject between the general studies of language. An understanding of semantics is essential to the study of language acquisition (how language users acquire a sense of meaning, as speakers and writers, listeners and readers) and of language change (how meaning alter over time). It is important for understanding language in social contexts as these are likely to affect meaning, and for understanding varieties of meaning and effects of style. It is thus one of the fundamental concepts in linguistics. The study of how meaning is constructed, interpreted, clarified, obscured, illustrated, simplified, negotiated, contradicted and paraphrased.

    As a prelude to other parts of this study, this chapter will discuss the background upon which this study was initiated, the statement of problems that led to this study, the Aim and Objectives of the study. Others are Significance of the study, Scope of work, Limitations of the Study and Definition of technical terms.


    1.2 Background of Study

    The word redundancy comes from the Latin word redundare (compete, increase) and means information surplus, for example, more information than necessary (Bakos, 2002). A short dictionary of defines redundancy as superfluity. It means overcoming the normal or necessary degree of something. Redundancy is such a state or property where a greater number of elements are used than is usual or necessary.

    This study review some of the semantic redundancies found in students' speech. This is with a view to identify some long observed peculiarities in the use of redundancy in the students' use of English.

    In the context of language studies, semantics occupies the end continuum. Semantics is at the top level because it deals with communication and interpretation. The major problem is with the definition of the subject simply as the study of meaning. Meaning is the target/goal in language. In whatever we do, we try to get meaning. The challenge is trying to find the meaning of meaning itself.

    The term redundancy is also used in literature, especially in the perception and interpretation of the literary text. In this context, according to Šenkár (2016), it is very important to return to the strands that conceal the nucleus of a nation, from which individual consciousness grew, formed feelings and influenced (cultural) actions. This problem also corresponds with the need to develop the pupils’ evaluative thinking, which is often forgotten in practice (Pisoňová, 2014). Redundancy in a literary work appears in the repetition of characteristic, thematic and linguistic-stylistic components in the literary work. From the recipient's point of view, redundancy in the text may be desirable or unnecessary.

    This project work is concerned with the repetitions made by students while speaking. However, any issue raised here would be considerably discussed and illustrated with adequate examples. Thus the findings of this work will on the other hand add to the existing literature(s) on semantic redundancy as a localized contribution to knowledge.


    1.3 Statement of Problems

    Investigation reveals the challenges of the existing research work, which entails that, one of the reasons for the increasing of the use of elements of language redundancy is the lack of examples of elitist language proficiency in the media, as the spontaneous speech of journalists, anchor men, bloggers, actors, and other media people is replete with speech errors. This is an uneconomic waste of other language means with the expectation that the recipient will choose the minimum of words that will allow to achieve understanding. Redundancy in speech is considered to be represented in superfluous words, constructions, turnovers, the contents of which can be conveyed by a simpler synonymous expression or a single word.


    1.4 Aim and Objectives of Study

    The aim of the study is to scrutinize the Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out as follows to:

    1. Determine the linguistic motivation for redundancy among students.
    2. Establish a clear demarcation between samples of data taken and their Standard English version.

    1.5 Significance of Study

    The relevance of clarity and correctness in communication cannot be over emphasized. Therefore, this work on semantic redundancy is desirable because it provides some insights into the prevalence of redundancy in the verbal interaction of the students selected as the subject of the project. More so, the findings of this work will not only contribute to the existing literature on semantic redundancy, but would help anyone who goes through this work to avoid tautology in their speech.

    This study will be of immense benefit to other researchers who intend to know more on this study and can also be used by non-researchers to build more on their research work. This study contributes to knowledge and could serve as a guide for other study.


    1.6 Research Methodology

    The researcher adopts a multi-dimensional approach in her efforts to get at the substance of this work. The researcher made use of both primary and secondary sources of obtaining pieces of information. Books, journal articles, encyclopedia, dictionaries, magazines, unpublished project works etc were consulted as secondary source materials. Questionnaire schedule was designed as a primary source of obtaining oral information from the respondents. Both structured and unstructured questionnaire items were designed for eliciting information out of these respondents. People from the age of twenty were considered qualified as respondents. In interpretation of the data collected, the researcher made use of descriptive and analytical approaches.


    1.7 Scope of Study

    The study focuses on the Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches. The study is limited towards that phonological, morphological and syntactic redundancies. This research is also limited to only semantic redundancy.


    1.8 Limitations of the Study

    During the course of this study, many things militated against its completion, some of which are:

    1. Time Constraint: The time frame given to accomplish this project was very short due to school academic calendar and it was carried out under pressure which made the researcher not to implement some necessary features.
    2. Research material: availability of research material is a major setback to the scope of the study.
    3. Frequent power failure: This made the researcher append more money on fuel to ensure sustainable power.
    4. Financial Constraint: Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet).

    1.9 Definition of Terms

    Semantics: Semantics is the study of the meaning of words and phrases (Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary, 2010).

    Redundancy: Redundancy is the state of not being necessary or useful (Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 2010).


    1.10 Conclusion

    In this chapter, the background of the study, aims and objectives, significance of the study, scope and limitation, definitions of terms as well as the research method have been presented to serve as adequate background to the study. The second chapter will gives a review of the literature related to this work.


    CHAPTER TWO

    2.0 Literature Review

    2.1 Introduction

    This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

    Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

    Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students’ Speeches”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


    To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


    Seminar Material
    ₦3,000
    Project Material
    ₦5,000

    For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


    Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

    ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
    Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
    MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
    Paycom (OPay)8030511988

    –– or ––



    After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


    Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




    You can get more research topics on English Education, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

    Defense Procedure for English Education Researchers


    In preparation for defending a project or seminar on An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students' Speeches, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


    Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


    Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


    During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


    Page Content Headings - An Assessment of Semantic Redundancy in Students’ Speeches

      Download Material (Docx)