1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background of Study
Leadership remains one of the most critical elements influencing employee behavior, organizational culture, and performance outcomes, particularly in the public sector. The manner in which leaders interact with subordinates, delegate authority, provide feedback, and inspire commitment significantly affects the motivation of workers. According to Northouse (2016), leadership is a process through which an individual influences a group to achieve a common objective, accenting the direct link between leadership effectiveness and organizational success (Northouse, 2016).
Motivation, a fundamental component of workplace productivity, determines how committed and enthusiastic employees are toward their job responsibilities. Robbins and Judge (2013) stated that motivation involves the processes that account for an individual's intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal. in the public sector where bureaucratic structures, political interference, and resource limitations are prevalent motivating employees requires more than financial incentives. It requires a leadership style that fosters trust, encourages participation, and recognizes employees’ contributions (Robbins and Judge, 2013).
In the Nigerian public sector, leadership has often been criticized for being rigid, hierarchical, and insensitive to the welfare of employees. According to Odetunde (2013), the absence of visionary and people-oriented leadership has contributed to low morale, absenteeism, and underperformance among public servants. Udechukwu (2009) affirmed that poor leadership practices in the public sector have led to a decline in employee enthusiasm and a growing disconnection between workers and institutional goals. This situation is worsened by delayed promotions, lack of recognition, limited opportunities for personal growth, and an overall lack of motivational incentives.
Leadership is commonly defined as the ability to influence, guide, and direct the behavior of others toward the achievement of organizational goals. According to Northouse (2016), leadership is “a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.” in the context of the public sector, leadership goes beyond merely issuing commands it involves mobilizing resources, inspiring employees, and creating an enabling environment for efficient service delivery (Northouse, 2016). Leadership style refers to the characteristic approach a leader adopts in directing, motivating, and managing people. These styles vary widely, ranging from autocratic and transactional to transformational and democratic, each with its implications for employee motivation and overall organizational performance (Lewin, Lippitt & White, 1939; Bass & Avolio, 1994).
Motivation, on the other hand, is the internal or external drive that stimulates individuals to pursue specific actions or goals. Robbins and Judge (2013) define motivation as “the processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal.” Motivated workers in the public sector are more likely to be proactive, responsive, and committed to delivering quality public services. However, in many government institutions, the absence of effective leadership often leads to diminished employee motivation, resulting in poor service delivery, low morale, and high turnover rates (Robbins and Judge, 2013). Public sector employees frequently encounter unique challenges, including rigid hierarchies, delayed promotions, inadequate recognition, and political interference, which collectively affect their morale and willingness to perform. While salary and job security are important, several studies have shown that non-material factors such as recognition, empowerment, and leadership communication significantly influence motivation (Herzberg, 1968; Deci & Ryan, 1985). This study is set against the backdrop of these challenges and seeks to examine the effect of leadership style on the motivation of workers in the public sector.
1.2 Statement of Problems
Investigation revealed that many leaders in the public sector adopt authoritarian or laissez-faire approaches, which often stifle innovation, and fail to inspire employees to perform optimally. When workers feel undervalued or disconnected from the decision-making process, their motivation and productivity are likely to diminish (Bass & Riggio, 2006). However, such styles are not consistently practiced across public institutions, especially in developing nations like Nigeria, where political interference and systemic corruption often dilute the effectiveness of leadership practices.
On the other hand, workers’ motivation is not solely dependent on financial incentives or job security. The psychological climate created by leadership marked by recognition, empowerment, and effective communication has been found to significantly impact an employee's willingness to go above and beyond in their duties (Amabile et al., 2004). Where leadership fails to meet these emotional and professional needs, there is likely to be increased absenteeism, high staff turnover, and a general decline in service delivery.
Furthermore, many public servants operate in environments riddled with delayed promotions, inadequate feedback mechanisms, and limited opportunities for professional development. It is against this backdrop that this study seeks to examine the effect of leadership style on the motivation of workers in the public sector.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to examine how different leadership styles affect the motivation of workers in the public sector, with a view to identifying effective strategies that can improve employee morale, job satisfaction, and overall organizational performance.
1.4 Aim and Objectives of Study
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of leadership style on the motivation of workers in the public sector. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out as follows:
- To determine how leadership styles influence job performance and employee commitment.
- To identify the prevalent leadership styles in the public sector.
- To examine the level of motivation among public sector workers.
- To assess the relationship between leadership style and worker motivation.
- To recommend leadership practices that can enhance worker motivation in public institutions.
1.5 Research Questions
Based on the objectives above, the following research questions will guide the study:
- What are the common leadership styles practiced in the public sector?
- What is the current level of motivation among workers in the public sector?
- Is there a relationship between leadership style and the motivation of public sector workers?
- How do different leadership styles impact job performance and employee commitment?
- What leadership strategies can improve motivation in the public sector?
1.6 Research Hypothesis
In order to pursue the objective of this study, the following generalized statements have been designed to guide and aids in obtaining the result for the experiment to be conducted. For this work, the null hypothesis will be represented with H0 while the alternative hypothesis will be represented with hypothesis H1.
Hypothesis One
- H0: There is no significant relationship between leadership style and the motivation of workers in the public sector
- H1: There is a significant relationship between leadership style and the motivation of workers in the public sector
Hypothesis Two
- H0: Transformational leadership style negatively influences employee motivation more than transactional or autocratic styles
- H1: Transformational leadership style positively influences employee motivation more than transactional or autocratic styles
Hypothesis Three
- H0: Democratic leadership style does not enhance employee commitment and job satisfaction
- H1: Democratic leadership style enhances employee commitment and job satisfaction
1.7 Significance of Study
It is believed that at the completion of the study, the findings will help to improve understanding of how leadership style influences worker motivation in the public sector. It will also contribute to policy formulation and leadership development programs aimed at boosting public service efficiency. The study will serve as a guide for leaders, administrators, and human resource managers on effective ways to inspire, manage, and retain motivated employees.
Furthermore, the findings will be beneficial to public sector leaders and administrators, as it will guide them in adopting more effective leadership practices that promote employee engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational productivity. It will also serve as a strategic tool for policy makers who seek to implement administrative reforms aimed at improving service delivery and workforce morale.
1.8 Scope and Delimitation of the Study
The study is focused on public sector workers within the Oyo State Civil Service. It will not include private sector organizations or federal ministries outside the state. The study is delimited to selected ministries and parastatals in the state capital due to time, resource, and accessibility constraints. It will focus solely on leadership styles and employee motivation, excluding other organizational factors such as technology, infrastructure, or policy frameworks.
1.9 Limitations of the Study
The study was limited by several factors including access to accurate and sufficient data, which was sometimes difficult due to bureaucratic restrictions in public offices. Time constraints also affected the duration available for data collection and analysis.
1.10 Definition of Terms
Leadership Style:
This refers to the approach or method a leader uses to direct, guide, and influence the behavior of subordinates. According to Northouse (2016), it includes styles such as autocratic, democratic, transactional, and transformational leadership, each affecting employees in different ways.
Motivation:
Motivation is the internal or external drive that influences an individual's behavior and performance. Robbins and Judge (2013) describe it as the process that explains why people engage in specific actions with varying intensity and persistence.
Public Sector:
The public sector comprises government-owned organizations and institutions that deliver public services. It includes ministries, departments, and agencies that operate using public funds and are accountable to citizens and the state (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2003).
…
