× Close

📚 Departmental Topics and Materials for (2024) Google Researchers
Accounting Topics
Accounting Education Topics
Adult Education Topics
Banking and Finance Topics
Civil Engineering Topics
📚 Project or Seminar Related (2024) Scholaristic Topics for Students

Search for Project and Seminar Topics Post Advertisement Items for Promotion
Anonymous
The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the DeRisking Strategies

The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies

Project / Seminar Material
Reference ID: PS-16675-TM

DEDICATION

This research work titled "The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies" is dedicated to God for his enabling grace and to all computer enthusiasts who help to make life a pleasant experience.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I owe my indebtedness to my Supervisor (Name of your Supervisor), the Head of Department (Name of your HOD), the Lecturers in the department of Actuarial Science, Book Authors and Profound Scholars of existing/related research material for your moral support that facilitated the successful completion of my (Tertiary Institution level). I am grateful to God Almighty and my parent for their financial support in my career. I really appreciate you all for everything, Thank you very much.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION


CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Conceptual Review
  • 2.3 Theoretical Framework
  • 2.4 Empirical Studies

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Research Design
  • 3.3 Population of Study
  • 3.4 Sampling and Sampling Technique
  • 3.5 Validation of Research Instrument
  • 3.6 Method of Data Collection
  • 3.7 Method of Data Analysis
  • 3.8 Questionnaire Administration
  • 3.9 Ethical Consideration
  • 3.10 Statistical Analysis

CHAPTER FOUR

DATA ANALYSIS, RESULT AND DISCUSSION

  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Presentation and Analysis of Data
  • 4.3 Re-statement of Research Questions
  • 4.4 Test of Hypotheses
  • 4.5 Discussion of Findings

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Summary of Findings
  • 5.3 Conclusion
  • 5.4 Recommendation
  • 5.5 Suggestion for Further Study

REFERENCES

APPENDIX A - “QUESTIONNAIRE”

ABSTRACT

De-risking refers to the practice of financial institutions exiting relationships with and closing the accounts of clients perceived to be high risk. The study was carried out to examine The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out to identify the barriers to de-risking strategies in Nigerian banks and know whether de-risking strategy have any significant impact on Nigerian Banks. The research design used in this report is descriptive design, utilizing questionnaire method to obtain information from the respondents for this project. A total of 200 (two hundred) respondents were selected for this study to represent the entire population of the study. For null hypotheses were formulated and tested using the one-way ANOVA and the t-test statistical tools at zero point zero five (0.05) level of significance. Primary data were collected from the primary source which questionnaire was used as an instrument of data collection while secondary data were sources from textbooks, journals, newspapers and the internet were employed. The data were presented on a frequency distribution table and analyzed using simple percentage, while hypothesis was tested using chi-square test. The study will provide a number of relevant case studies highlighting innovative approaches to, and lessons learned from, addressing de-banking challenges across six different sectors with varying degrees of banking incentives, as well as a set of recommendations about how invested stakeholders can better address de-risking challenges. Based on the findings, it is recommended that financial institutions should be required to take steps to identify and assess their money financing threat risks for customers, countries or geographic areas, and delivery channels. Also, designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions should have policies, controls and procedures in place to effectively manage and mitigate their risks, which should be approved by senior management and be consistent with national requirements and guidance.


The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies

CHAPTER ONE

1.1 Introduction

De-risking refers to the practice of financial institutions exiting relationships with and closing the accounts of clients perceived to be high risk. Rather than manage these risky clients, financial institutions opt to end the relationship altogether, consequently minimizing their own risk exposure while leaving clients bank-less. In developing countries, the concept and practice of entrepreneurship has been embraced by both academia and professionals as a result of its effect on the economic development and growth of nations. Globally, there has been bolstering emphasis on female entrepreneurship in light of tangible evidence of the importance of new business creation for economic growth and development (Bergmann, Müller & Schrettle 2014; Lock & Lawton-Smith 2016).

As a prelude to other parts of this study, this chapter will discuss the background upon which this study was initiated, the statement of problems that led to this study, the Aim and Objectives of the study. Others are Significance of the study, Scope of work, Research hypothesis and questions, Limitations of the Study and Definition of technical terms.


1.2 Background of Study

In recent years, the international community has begun to focus on financial inclusion as part of a broader strategy to reduce poverty, encourage economic development, and promote stability and security. In the US alone, 50.9 million adults are considered under banked and have relied on alternative financial services in the past 12 months, including payday lenders, pawn shops, or check-cashing services. The Smallholder Agribusiness Financing (SAF) model by the Program for Rural Outreach of Financial Innovations and Technologies (PROFIT) through this chapter provides an alternative solution through de-risking of these agricultural financing processes.

Globally, demand for international banking services appears to be outpacing capacity to meet that demand. In 2016, more banks reported increased demand for international banking services than increased capacity to meet demand. Over 60 percent of survey participants in both East and South Asia reported increases in demand. And in East Asia, Europe and Central Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean and Sub-Saharan Africa, banks more frequently reported increased demand than increased capacity to meet that demand.

Recent efforts to strengthen the global financial system will ultimately contribute to greater financial stability and a safer world. However, the resultant de-risking is reportedly having a negative impact on banking in emerging markets. The financiers on the other hand face higher loan servicing costs due to limited volumes and high information acquisition costs coupled with lack of collateral or inadequate security from the rural farmers. Some of the financiers also lack technical knowledge at the bank level to evaluate and analyze the creditworthiness of these agribusinesses.

Risk management is one of the most effective strategies which companies and financial institutions must adopt it in their major projects. Risk management is considered as a part of project management but it has been neglected in our country and only a small number of organizations hold a clear view on risk management process. Developing scientific attitude towards risk management and introducing the processes and techniques of risk management thoroughly and scientifically will lead to systematic codification and application of project risk management in the country and the companies (Sheikh and Sobhiye, 2012).

Unbanked or under banked communities, particularly in the developing world, are also vulnerable to private lenders. These “loan sharks” offer no legal customer protection measures and have anecdotally been linked to extortion and even threats of violence. As banks close the accounts of non-bank financial service providers, underserved communities may be forced to increase their reliance on these types of costlier and less-regulated options.

As financial institutions re-calculate risk appetites and decide to exit relationships, they directly and negatively affect these sectors and the populations they serve. The closure of these bank accounts not only threatens these businesses but also jeopardizes the vital flow of remittances to Somalia from diaspora populations, which constitute an estimated 25 to 45 percent of the country’s GDP and serve as a key source of income for more than 40 percent of its vulnerable population. Financial exclusion is a huge barrier for disadvantaged populations.

Therefore, in Nigeria where the research was carried out, the activities that was conducted is to know the Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies.


1.3 Statement of Problems

Investigation revealed that de-risking practices have not been localized in any particular population, community, or industry. However, in recent years there has been an “aggregation of results” best described as a trend toward de-risking of sectors, including money service businesses (MSBs), foreign embassies, nonprofit organizations (NPOs), and correspondent banks. Those closures have had a ripple effect on financial access for the individuals and populations served by those businesses.

Regulatory authorities continue to emphasize that de-risking is not in line with international guidelines, and in fact is a misapplication of the risk-based approach. Yet in the absence of clear instructions or an incentive to bank these clients, account closures continue across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. These closures have significant humanitarian, economic, political, and security implications, effectively cutting off access to finances, further isolating communities from the global financial system, exacerbating political tensions, and potentially facilitating the development of parallel underground “shadow markets”.

Unfortunately, little empirical data is available about the extent and nature of the client relationships being exited and the decision-making processes of financial institutions. This presents challenges to assessing the scale and scope of the problem, identifying vulnerable communities affected by the reduction in services, and developing effective responses. Nevertheless, this study endeavors to illuminate a number of existing trends and themes relating to the issue and provides some insight into likely factors behind de-risking practices.


1.4 Aim and Objectives of Study

The aim of the study is to examine the Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies. In achieving this aim, the following specific objectives were laid out as follows:

  1. To identify the barriers to de-risking strategies in Nigerian banks; and
  2. To know whether de-risking strategy have any significant impact on Nigerian Banks.

1.5 Research Questions

The study came up with research questions so as to be able to ascertain the above stated objectives. The specific research questions for the study are stated below as follows:

  • Does de-risking strategy have any significant impact on Nigerian banks?
  • Is there a barrier to de-risking strategy in Nigerian banks?

1.6 Research Hypothesis

In order to pursue the objective of this study, the following generalized statements have been designed to guide and aids in obtaining the result for the experiment to be conducted. For this work, the null hypothesis will be represented with H0 while the alternative hypothesis will be represented with hypothesis H1.

Hypothesis One

  • H0: De-risking strategy has no significant impact on Access Bank Plc.
  • H1: De-risking strategy has significant impact on Access Bank Plc.

Hypothesis Two

  • H0: There is no significant barrier to de-risking strategy by Banks in Nigeria.
  • H1: There are barriers to de-risking strategy by Banks in Nigeria.

1.7 Significance of Study

The study will provide a number of relevant case studies highlighting innovative approaches to, and lessons learned from, addressing de-banking challenges across six different sectors with varying degrees of banking incentives, as well as a set of recommendations about how invested stakeholders can better address de-risking challenges. Rather than manage these risky clients, financial institutions opt to end the relationship altogether, consequently minimizing their own risk exposure while leaving clients bank-less. This exploratory study was designed to identify the core drivers of this practice and its implications for financial inclusion goals, particularly as they affect vulnerable communities.

This study will be of immense benefit to other researchers who intend to know more on this study and can also be used by non-researchers to build more on their research work. This study contributes to knowledge and could serve as a guide for other study.


1.8 Scope of Study

The scope of the research is focused on the Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies in Nigeria using Access Bank Plc as a case study.


1.9 Limitations of the Study

During the course of this study, many things militated against its completion, some of which are:

  1. Time Constraint: The time frame given to accomplish this project was very short due to school academic calendar and it was carried out under pressure which made the researcher not to implement some necessary features.
  2. Research material: availability of research material is a major setback to the scope of the study.
  3. Frequent power failure: This made the researcher append more money on fuel to ensure sustainable power.
  4. Financial Constraint: Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).

1.10 Definition of Terms

De-risk: This means to make something safer by reducing the possibility that something bad will happen and that money will be lost.

Barrier: Anything that prevents or obstructs passage, access, or progress.

Evaluation: An appraisal of something to determine its worth or fitness.

Impact: To have a strong effect on someone or something.

Strategy: A plan of action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim.

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the …

Summary Headlines for The Impact and Barriers of Evaluating the De-Risking Strategies