Project Topics Seminar Topics Post UTME Nursing Exam Past Questions
Search Topic
PARKLYN
ERVICES
· RC: 2994849
A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development

A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development

@SparklynServices
WhatsApp Channel

DEDICATION

This research material, titled “A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development” is dedicated to God for His boundless grace and guidance. It is also a tribute to all computer enthusiasts whose contributions made my research journey smoother and enriched my documentation process, making the experience truly fulfilling.




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am profoundly grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this project. I am especially grateful to my Supervisor (Name), the Head of Department (Name), and the Lecturers in the Department of Philosophy for their invaluable guidance and support. I also acknowledge the contributions of authors and scholars whose works on A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development provided essential insights. Special thanks go to my study area (and any funding organizations, if applicable) for their financial assistance. I am equally thankful to stakeholders, including mentors, teachers, and colleagues, for their encouragement and support. Finally, I deeply appreciate my family and friends for their patience and unwavering support throughout this journey. Your contributions have been instrumental in making this research a reality.




PRELIMINARY PAGES


CHAPTER ONE

Problem And Background

  • 1.1 Introduction 1
  • 1.2 Problem of the Study 4
  • 1.3 Purpose of the Study 6
  • 1.4 Scope of the Study 6
  • 1.5 Methodology 7
  • 1.6 Division of the Work 7

CHAPTER TWO

The Piagetian Ideology

  • 2.1 Historical Background on Piaget 8
  • 2.2 Piaget’s Works 13
  • 2.3 General Orientation to Piaget’s Theory 15
  • 2..3.1 The Concept of Genetic Epistemology 15
  • 2.3.2 The Biological Approach 16
  • 2,3.3 The Concept of structuralism 16

CHAPTER THREE

Piagetian Theories Of Cognitive Development Vis-à-Vis Other Cognitive Theories

  • 3.1 The General Features of Piaget Theories 18
  • 3.1.1 The Sensorimotor Period 18
  • 3.1.1.1 Modification of Reflexes 19
  • 3.1.1.2 Primary Circular Reactions 20
  • 3.1.1.3 Secondary Circular Reactions 20
  • 3.1.1.4 Coordination of Means-end Relations 21
  • 3.1.1.5 Tertiary Circular Reactions 21
  • 3.1.1.6 Mental Combinations 22
  • 3.1.2 The Preoperational Period 22
  • 3.1.2.1 Egocentrism 24
  • 3.1.2.2 Centration 24
  • 3.1.2.3 Semilogical Reasoning 25
  • 3.1.2.4 Limited Social Cognition 26
  • 3.1.3 The Concrete Operational period 26
  • 3.1.4 The Formal Operational Period 29
  • 3.1.5 The Mechanisms of Piaget’s Development 30
  • 3.1.5.1 Cognitive Organization 31
  • 3.1.5.2 Cognitive Adaptation 32
  • 3.1.4.1.1 Assimilation 33
  • 3.1.4.1.2 Accommodation 34
  • 3.1.4.2 Cognitive Equilibration 35
  • 3.2 Other Cognitive Theories vis-à-vis Piaget Theories 36
  • 3.2.1 Jerome Bruner’s Theory of Cognitive Development 36
  • 3.2.1.1 Enactive Mode 36
  • 3.2.1.2. Iconic Mode 37
  • 3.2.1.3 Symbolic Mode 37
  • 3.2.2 Vygotsky’s Theory of Cognitive Development 38
  • 3.2.3 Albert Bandura’a Social Cognitive Theory 41

CHAPTER FOUR

Evaluation And Conclusion

  • 4.1 A Critique of Piagetian Cognitive Theories 45
  • 4.1.1 The Underestimation of Children’s Capabilities 46
  • 4.1.2 The Inadequate Account of Mechanisms 47
  • 4.1.3 The Inadequate Notion of Stage 48
  • 4.1.4 The Inadequate Account of Training Children for High Reasoning 50
  • 4.1.5 The Underestimation of Cultural Role in Development 50
  • 4.1.6 The Inadequate Method of Clinical Research 51
  • 4.2 Conclusion 53
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY 57



A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development



Problem And Background

1.1 Introduction

Generally speaking, one of the earliest observations we make in life is that the desire to explore the unknown to further our knowledge and understanding is a fundamental characteristic of being human. Thus, to boldly go into the unknown is also what each of us does in the course of our development.

Psychological studies have found out that human development is both the most fascinating and most complex science we have. No wonder then, Piaget pointed out that “… life is a continuous creation of increasingly complex forms with the environment”[1] This complex forms provided a ground for the contemporary research on human development to consistently emphasize the multidisciplinary approach needed to describe and explain how people change (and how they remain the same)

over time. More still, Kail asserts that another way to approach development is to focus on thought processes and the construction of knowledge[2], which shows that interest in cognitive development, is a relatively recent phenomenon. Hence, developmentalists, who have been operating mainly within the framework of either psychoanalytic or learning theories now, discover a new aspect of development to explore − a new framework for their thinking.

According to Hilgard (1964), “Probably, the best way to view cognitive psychology is to look at it as trend of humanism and behaviorism, with an emphasis on thought processes, reasoning and problem solving.”[3] By this, we mean the process of becoming aware, or coming to know a perceptual image. In Piaget’s own view, cognitive development centers on the movement of a child through succeeding stages of cognitive organization, whereby this progress is accomplished by means of assimilation and accommodation. As the child encounters new experiences he/she both reacts to them in terms of what the child already knows (assimilation) and revises his/her worldview as a result of the new information (accommodation). Thus, Cognition is in a process of constant change and reorganization. Piaget believes that “at certain points in development, these reorganizations are so momentous and fundamental that they represent a whole new way of understanding the world”4.

When such a transformation happens, for him, (Piaget), a new stage of cognitive development is reached. The major stages he proposed are the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational periods. I have set out to counteract in line with the contemporary researchers, some of the underestimated views of cognitive development of infants and young children and then give it a positive position as will be seen in the chapters that follow.


1.2 Problem Of The Study

The fact of a child’s stages of growth constitutes the current understanding of cognitive development, which is based upon conclusions drawn by scientists who formulate questions and device methodologies by which their questions can be answered. For instance, it is said that, “Swiss developmental Psychologist, Jean Piaget was so often asked by American audience, “what should we do to foster a child’s cognitive development…?5

It is by understanding clearly the true humanistic nature of this process that Jean Piaget set forth to offer the world his cognitive developmental theories. However, “we should remember that no particular theory which provides such a comprehensive explanation of development, can be expected to withstand the tests of further investigations without undergoing some criticisms said, Beilin, 1989, 1990’ Daehler & Bukatko, 1985; Halford, 1989, 1990.”6 There are:

1. In his (Piaget) child’s developmental theories, he underestimated the cognitive capabilities of children. For instance, the kinds of memory, which researchers now find in babies at 6 months of age, were not found by Piaget until babies were 18 months old.

2. The concept of stage has also encountered many objections: for example, that it gives the false impression that development proceeds by a series of abrupt jerks rather than smoothly; that intellectual functioning at any one age shows more fluctuation than the concept of stage would suggests; that cross-cultural variability limits the usefulness of the concept; that environment is more influential than Piaget allows; and so on.

Of course, Piaget did not have many of the methods that are now available to scholars, including equipment and procedures to measure the electrical activity of the brain. These and various others, which we shall see later constitute a great problem about his theories and therefore needs to be carefully examined in order to clarify matters not well presented. A proper examination into Piagetian theories of cognitive development, as well as critically analyzing theories, is what this writer set out to explore in this research work.


1.3 Purpose Of The Study

The aim of this work is to make a proper study into the Piagetian theories of cognitive development, as well as placing them side-by-side with other cognitive theories, with a view to eliciting from them the positive views and criticizing others that seem vague to the contemporary mind.


1.4 Scope Of The Study

The main area this research work covers is the view of Piagetian theories of cognitive development. Hence, the views of other psychologists, scientists, and some philosophical opinions will be entertained, but only as they affect Piaget’s line of thought.


1.5 Methodology Of The Research

The method is expository, analytic, and prescriptive. As this is a philosophical work fideistic arguments are carefully avoided.


1.6 The Division Of The Work

This research is sectionalized into four chapters for a better apprehension. Chapter one explicates the background, problem of the study, purpose of the study, scope, method of research and division of work. Chapter two is devoted to the Piagetian Ideology. It traces his historical background as well as presents a general orientation to his theories. Chapter three comprises of the Piagetian theories of cognitive development in comparison with other cognitive theories. Finally, the evaluation of the whole work is conveyed in chapter four. Hence, chapter four represents my contribution to the academic world.


CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the review of related literature. A literature review includes the current knowledge as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. It documents the state of the art with respect to the topic you are writing. It surveys the literature in the topic selected. In this research work the literature review includes the conceputal review, theoretical framework, the review of related literature …

Procedure for Accessing and Downloading the Complete Material in PDF or DOCX Format

Above is a preview excerpt of the full study on “A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development”. The complete material, including all five chapters, is available for download upon request.


To obtain the complete research material content, simply place an order by paying the specified project or seminar fee using the account details or electronic payment (E-payment) system provided below.


Seminar Material
₦3,000
Project Material
₦5,000

For Mobile Money (MoMo) and Researchers Outside Nigeria, Kindly Request Complete Material via WhatsApp.


Account Details - For USSD / POS Transfer

ACCT NAMESPARKLYN SERVICES
Zenith Bank PLC1222599051
MoniePoint (MFB)8030511988
Paycom (OPay)8030511988

–– or ––



After payment, send message containing your payment receipt to Sparklyn Services with the phone number displayed below.


Once payment is confirmed, the complete document will be delivered via WhatsApp or email in Microsoft Word (MS-Word) format.




You can get more research topics on Philosophy, if you did not see your preferred topic from the alternate list above.

Defense Procedure for Philosophy Researchers


In preparation for defending a project or seminar on A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development, it is imperative that as a nursing student, you demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of your research. The defense process is structured to include presenting your work, answering questions, and illustrating its pertinence. Initially, provide a succinct yet thorough introduction to your research topic, emphasizing its importance and the objectives, ensuring that both the audience and the External Examiner can understand the scope of your study.


Prior to your defense, be thoroughly acquainted with your research abstract and the critical elements of Chapter One, including motivation for embarking on this research, problem statement, objectives, and significance. In Chapter Two, be ready to cite at least two references from the literature review. For Chapter Three, you should be equipped to discuss the methodologies, tools, and techniques utilized. In Chapter Four, defend your research by justifying the findings and linking them to your research objectives.


Conclude your defense by succinctly summarizing the study and offering insightful, evidence-based recommendations. A professional dress code, such as wearing a suit and tie, is vital to create a favorable impression and elevate your presentation.


During the question and answer segment, the External Examiner may pose questions pertaining to your research. If confronted with a challenging or irrelevant question, respond diplomatically with, “Sorry, Sir/Madam, the question asked is beyond the scope of my study.” Whenever possible, direct your answers back to your research findings to reinforce your expertise.


Page Content Headings - A Critique on Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development

    Download Material (Docx)